Tex Norman

Rilke Gave Bad Advice



Posted: Tuesday, September 30, 2008

by

Rainer Maria Rilke was born on December 4th, 1875 in Prague.  His father was one of those hawk, hard-assed militarily inclined man's man (like the father in The Sound of Music sort of) who sent his son to a military boarding school as a child.  Apparently the personality of Rilke was such that his days in military school were days of profound misery.

I don't know if Rilke is a good poet or not.  One problem, for me, is that I can only read his work in translation, being one of those Americans too ignorant and unmotivated to have learned another language. Check out one of Rilke's poems at: 

http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15814
Rilke published his first book of poetry at age 19.  It may sound like an excuse, but it was easier to get poetry published in his day.  Fewer people were writing poetry and more people were reading it.  Supply and demand was at work, pure and simple.

One of the most significant thing Rilke wrote for most Americans reading stuff today is a little volume called Letters To A Young Poet, a collection of 10 letters that are more like essays than letters.  The way I understand it Franz Kappus a 19 year old military school student,considering entering the German military, wrote to Rilke because Rilke had attended the same military school when he was younger.  Kappus was a wantabe poet and Rilke was a recognized, published poet.  The first letter from Kappus was asking Rilke to read his poetry and give him some feedback.  Very little feedback was given to the young poet.  Rilke and Kappus continued to correspond from 1902 to 1908.  Those letters would surely have been lost forever, without Kappus.  The young poet kept the letters from Rilke and three years after Rilke had died, in 1929, Kappus assembled and published the ten letters. in book form. 

The title fo the book sort of implies that this is advice from an old, wise, established guy to a young, budding new guy, but that's not true.  Kappus was about 19 and Rilke was like 27.  It seems that when Rilke got that first letter from the young Kappus he saw something of himself within Kappus.  Rilke had been a student at that same military school, and hated it.  Kappus was torn about what to do next with his life, and wondering if he had the talent as a poet to follow the road less traveled, the one Rilke had picked. 

One of the questions Kappus wanted answered is a question every poet, every artist wants to know: Am I good enough?

Rilke's answer is that this question is the wrong question.  Rilke says that every person should go into one's self, and seek out motive.  Why do you even want to write?  Rilke gets all touchy-feely about it saying that a poet needs to ask will I die if I can't write? 

To me such thoughts are silly.  You have to have food, and water, and be protected from extreme weather conditions to live, but you don't have to write to live.  No one does.  You may feel compelled, or driven to write, or paint, or make dolls, but it is a comanding inclination within one's mind, but it is not a life and death matter. 

Of course, all compelling forces within, when ignored, may not kill you, but they will contribute to a miserable life.   

Rilke tells the young poet: 

. . . meet this solemn question with a strong, simple "I must," then build your life in accordance with this necessityand so he responded.  . . . as I have said, one feels one could live without writing, then one shouldn't write at all.  ~Rilke

There is a generally accepted belief that borders on conceit.   Rilke is saying,  Unless you have this "gift that I have" you should not do what I do.  Actors say, "if you don't have to act, then don't be an actor, if you don't have to write, then don't be a writer, if you don't have to paint, then sell shoes."

I don't like the advice.  It makes art an elitist act, and spreads the lie that creative output is some sort of God given gift and that divides the artist from the dull, uncreative masses.

If your daily life seems poor, do not blame it; blame yourself that you are not poet enough to call forth its riches; for the Creator, there is no poverty.  ~Rilke



I do believe that there are both positive and negative aspects of being a creative person, and I realize that not everyone practices a creative art form, but in my opinion, that is not because they are inferior, or that they were taking a smoke break when God passed out gifts and talents.  Talent, and creativity is a mystery to most of us because we can't explain why some seem to have it, and some don't.  The truth is that just because we don't know something doesn't mean it is unknowable.  At one time humans were food gatherers.  We had no idea how to grow our food.  We were hunters because we had no clue how to domesticate livestock.  But growing and herding were within reach even for the food gatherers.  In a similar way, all of us have the potential to be poets, or artists of some kind.  What happens to make the potential become a reality, that part, I'm not sure about.  It may be what was valued and encouraged when you were a child.  It most certainly is something that goes one in your mind, and is probably some behavior that is reinforced in some way by people who's opinion matters to you.

The only journey is the one within. ~Rilke

The journey of life seems to me to be a inner path.  This is an important truth, and it also explains why it is such a difficult path.  In the mind we are interpreting the sensations we are receiving in the moment, but we are also applying our past experiences, and extrapolating on those past experiences to anticipate what might happen.

Then there is one final quote I like:

There are no classes in life for beginners; right away you are always asked to deal with what is most difficult. ~Rilke

Tex Norman is a social worker, currently working at the Oklahoma DHS Abuse and Neglect hotline. He interviews people reporting abuse and/or neglect of children and vulnerable adults and writes a narrative. The narratives (and demographics) are used to initiate investigations of the allegations. He says it is like writing 8 to 10 stories a day. In August 2012, he will have been married to Kathie for 40 years. He has a son Ryan who earned a PhD from Princeton and he is now a scientist doing research in molecular biology. Tex spends his free time working as an artist and writer. He has one art site, and a blog that might be of interest: http://tex-norman.artistwebsites.com/ and http://collagepoetrybytex.blogspot.com/
This Article has been viewed 1,073 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (3 total)
» left by Mr. B
from Malibu,Ca. 2 years 96 days ago.
This guy goes from taking Rilke as literal as possible,"you don't have to write to live"  on to taking such liberties as presuming that Rilke is writing from a place of"borderline conciet". He is not being touchy-feely, this is being candid.He didn't want the young poet to die, nor did he think he would if he didn't pursue writing. He would simply find another career to pursue. And from the very beginning, Rilke encourages him by telling him to listen to no-one, especially one who criticizes. He states most succintly:"You are looking outward and, above all else, that you must not do now."He also states to young Kappus,"critical intent is too far removed from my nature."This hardly seems like borderline conciet to me.
» left by Cândido
from Madeira, Portugal 2 years 81 days ago.
I've agreed with Mr. B without even reading his comment as I was conceiving the same answer while reading Mr. Tex Norman's critique. You can't read Rilke's letters as you would a recipe, you must step away and not let his writing "hurt" you. I do agree with you when you point out that Rilke says you shouldn't write unless you're as gifted as he is. Probably making it look like an elitist type of art. But as I said, you can't let it hurt you as you must contextualize his behaviour with his time - writers in his time tend to be a bit narcissistic. I advise you to read his «Self-portrait», it will enlighten you more on what I'm talking about.
Overall you wrote a really good and well thought critique (probably missing the right terminology here), just don't let Rilke's narcissism be what you learn of his writing.
» left by Tim
from Australia 1 year 179 days ago.
I enjoyed reading your piece, but its title is a little unfortunate.
 
It doesnt matter whether Rilke's advice the young poet was good or bad. If it's beneficial to young poets or anyone else, then great! Otherwise, look elsewhere.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.